ReefPriceIndex

← All insights

Clownfish Prices: Ocellaris, Percula, and the Designer Market

What the most popular saltwater fish costs across vendors — and where designer names quietly multiply the price.

Published July 29, 2026 · figures recomputed from data through September 5, 2026 · by Reef Price Index

The clownfish is the best-selling saltwater fish in the world, the one species almost every reefer buys at least once — and its market has quietly split into two completely different products sold under one name: the ordinary ocellaris, and a designer industry built on top of it.

The clownfish market today

Group Low Median High Listings
Ocellaris Clownfish $24.99 $72.49 $211.99 65
Percula Clownfish $31.99 $31.99 $168.99 7
Clownfish (other species / designer) $31.99 $62.49 $149.99 56

The rows split by what the listing claims to be: true ocellaris, true percula, and everything else — which in today's market overwhelmingly means designer clownfish: named pattern lines (snowflakes, lightnings, storms, and their successors) plus the other Amphiprion species. An ordinary ocellaris has a median of $72.49; the designer/other group's median is $62.49, with a top end of $149.99.

What actually sets a clownfish's price

Buying advice from the numbers

If you just want the classic orange fish, the ocellaris median of $72.49 is the honest benchmark, and paying much above it for an unnamed fish buys nothing biological. If a designer catches your eye, remember the zoanthid rule applies to fish too: designer supply grows every generation, and yesterday's limited-release pattern reliably becomes next year's mid-tier fish. The pattern you love at $149.99 today will exist at a fraction of that within a couple of breeding cycles — patience is the biggest discount in the designer market.

Method, in one line: every figure above is computed from our daily snapshots of the complete public catalogs of the vendors we track — nothing is estimated, surveyed, or quoted from other sites. Details in the methodology. Spotted something that looks wrong? Tell us and we'll check it against the underlying snapshots.

Related reading